New York Times lawsuit filings reveal internal OpenAI and Microsoft concerns over AI training data legality
The New York Times has submitted new court filings in its ongoing copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. These documents include internal communications from employees of both companies, which the NYT presents as evidence that the companies were aware of potential legal and ethical issues surrounding the use of copyrighted material for training their artificial intelligence models. Key revelations include a Microsoft director allegedly describing AI scraping as "the largest theft of labor in human history," and internal discussions within OpenAI and Microsoft about the potential for AI to create a "doom loop" for the web by circumventing paywalls and reducing traffic to original content sources. The filings aim to challenge OpenAI's defense of fair use, suggesting that the companies' internal awareness of these issues undermines their legal arguments. While the existence of these internal communications is established by their inclusion in the court documents, their full legal interpretation and impact on the lawsuit's outcome remain subject to judicial review. OpenAI and Microsoft have not publicly commented on the specific content of these newly revealed internal communications, maintaining their general stance that their AI training practices fall under fair use.
25 articles from 25 outlets covered this story. No difference in framing or figures was found between them. The underlying claim is sourced from a press release.
What do all outlets agree on?
25 outlets covered “New York Times lawsuit filings reveal internal OpenAI and Microsoft concerns over AI…”. All of them report the following:
- The New York Times filed new documents in its lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft
- The filings contain internal communications from OpenAI and Microsoft employees
- A Microsoft director allegedly called AI training data scraping "the largest theft of labor in human history"
- Internal discussions within the companies mentioned a "doom loop" for the web
- OpenAI was aware of methods to circumvent paywalls
- The filings are intended to counter OpenAI's fair use defense
Did outlets disagree about this?
No. All 25 outlets covering “New York Times lawsuit filings reveal internal OpenAI and Microsoft concerns over AI…” reported it the same way — no difference in framing or figures was found between them.
Which outlets covered this?
All 25 articles found on this story, grouped by the stance of the piece. Every link goes to the original publisher.