About

AI Coverage collects reporting on artificial intelligence from hundreds of publications, groups it by event rather than by article, and shows who covered each one — including who didn’t.

The problem

A single announcement can produce sixty articles across forty outlets in a day. Most read alike, because most are rewrites of the same source. A few are not: they add reporting, or they frame the event in a way the others don’t. Finding those few means reading all sixty.

Every story here is one real-world event with every article we found attached to it. The bar under each headline shows how coverage splits across camps that habitually disagree about AI, so you can see at a glance whether a story was reported broadly or only by people already inclined to care about it.

What each story carries

• A neutral summary written to adopt no outlet’s framing.
• The facts every outlet reports the same way.
• Where outlets differ — in wording, framing, or the figures cited.
• Every article, linked to its publisher, grouped by the stance of the piece.

What we don’t do

We don’t republish anyone’s work. Story pages link out to the original and always will. Article text is fetched only to analyse it and is discarded afterwards.

We don’t rate publications. Evidence grades describe how a claim is sourced — a paper, a shipped product, a press release, an anonymous source. A press release carried by an excellent newspaper is still a press release, and saying so is not a comment on the newspaper.

Who runs it

AI Coverage is an independent project. It is not owned by, funded by, or affiliated with any company it covers. Write to hello@aicoverage.org — corrections, source suggestions and complaints all reach a person.