ISTA-DASLab releases GSQ-RCO GGUF for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, with performance comparison
ISTA-DASLab has released GSQ-RCO GGUF versions of the DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 model, as announced by the developers on r/LocalLLaMA. This release includes a 2.25 bits per weight (bpw) variant, which has been subsequently compared against the official DeepSeek API to evaluate its performance.
3 articles from 1 outlet covered this story. The underlying claim is sourced from a benchmark.
What do all outlets agree on?
1 outlet covered “ISTA-DASLab releases GSQ-RCO GGUF for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, with performance…”. All of them report the following:
- ISTA-DASLab released GSQ-RCO GGUFs
- The GGUFs are for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- A 2.25 bits per weight (bpw) GGUF version was released
- The GGUF was compared against the official API
Which outlets covered this?
All 3 articles found on this story, grouped by the stance of the piece. Every link goes to the original publisher.
pragmatist3