Federal Judge Rules Police Use of Flock Cameras Constitutes Unconstitutional Mass Surveillance
A federal judge in Ohio has ruled that a police search utilizing Flock Safety's license plate readers amounted to "indiscriminate mass surveillance" and was unconstitutional. This significant legal decision establishes a precedent regarding the use of automated license plate recognition technology by law enforcement. The ruling underscores concerns about privacy and the scope of surveillance powers.
2 articles from 2 outlets covered this story. The underlying claim is sourced from a press release.
What do all outlets agree on?
2 outlets covered “Federal Judge Rules Police Use of Flock Cameras Constitutes Unconstitutional Mass…”. All of them report the following:
- A federal judge made a ruling
- The ruling concerned police use of Flock cameras
- The police search was deemed 'mass surveillance'
- The police search was ruled unconstitutional
- The ruling occurred in Ohio
Which outlets covered this?
All 2 articles found on this story, grouped by the stance of the piece. Every link goes to the original publisher.